Prompt.observer
Intention
noob
This is the user competence for the specified categories. Four tiers are possible - noob, intermediate, expert and professional.
To understand how to make online learning platforms more accessible to people with disabilities.
Initial prompt
Clarity
score: 50/100
Clear and easy to understand without ambiguity.
Specificity
score: 40/100
Specific enough to guide the model toward the desired response.
Relevance
score: 60/100
Relevant to the intended topic or objective.
Completeness
score: 45/100
Includes all necessary information required for a comprehensive response.
Brevity
score: 80/100
Concise without unnecessary verbosity.
How can online learning be better?
Contextual Adequacy
score: 40/100
Provides enough context to understand the background or scenario.
Purpose Alignment
score: 50/100
Aligns with the intended purpose or goal of the interaction.
Grammar and Syntax
score: 80/100
Well-written with proper grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure.
Bias Avoidance
score: 80/100
Avoids leading language, biases, or loaded terms that could skew the response.
Creativity Encouragement
score: 30/100
Encourages creative or insightful responses when appropriate.
Top improved criteria
Clarity
Clarified the question by specifying the strategies to be discussed.
Specificity
Added focus on making platforms accessible to people with disabilities to increase detail and precision.
Contextual Adequacy
Provided context by mentioning accessibility in online learning platforms.
Improved prompt
Clarity
score: 80/100
Clear and easy to understand without ambiguity.
Specificity
score: 75/100
Specific enough to guide the model toward the desired response.
Relevance
score: 85/100
Relevant to the intended topic or objective.
Completeness
score: 80/100
Includes all necessary information required for a comprehensive response.
Brevity
score: 75/100
Concise without unnecessary verbosity.
What strategies can make online learning platforms more accessible to people with disabilities?
Contextual Adequacy
score: 80/100
Provides enough context to understand the background or scenario.
Purpose Alignment
score: 85/100
Aligns with the intended purpose or goal of the interaction.
Grammar and Syntax
score: 90/100
Well-written with proper grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure.
Bias Avoidance
score: 90/100
Avoids leading language, biases, or loaded terms that could skew the response.
Creativity Encouragement
score: 60/100
Encourages creative or insightful responses when appropriate.
Top improved criteria
Completeness
Requested detailed recommendations to cover more comprehensive information.
Purpose Alignment
Aligned purpose by specifying support for learners with various disabilities.
Creativity Encouragement
Encouraged creativity by asking for enhancing accessibility features.
Best Prompt
Clarity
score: 95/100
Clear and easy to understand without ambiguity.
Specificity
score: 95/100
Specific enough to guide the model toward the desired response.
Relevance
score: 95/100
Relevant to the intended topic or objective.
Completeness
score: 95/100
Includes all necessary information required for a comprehensive response.
Brevity
score: 85/100
Concise without unnecessary verbosity.
Provide detailed recommendations for enhancing accessibility features in online learning platforms to support learners with various disabilities.
Contextual Adequacy
score: 95/100
Provides enough context to understand the background or scenario.
Purpose Alignment
score: 95/100
Aligns with the intended purpose or goal of the interaction.
Grammar and Syntax
score: 95/100
Well-written with proper grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure.
Bias Avoidance
score: 95/100
Avoids leading language, biases, or loaded terms that could skew the response.
Creativity Encouragement
score: 85/100
Encourages creative or insightful responses when appropriate.
Education
TBD
Online Learning
TBD
Accessibility
TBD
Tags
